i so happened to chance upon my alma mater's website today just to awaken my sleeping senses to the new message from the principal himself in response to all the buzz that the report of vs turning co-ed caused. to me: its bullshit. don't come up with excuses for it. even my classmates who so happened to be NOT from vs agreed with me without hesitation. surprise me.
the authority has stated that the media has "distorted our purpose and intent" of the proposal of changing the way of teaching in the school. what a load of crap. the new paper's report on the 19 Aug 2005 clearly stated that "MOE confirmed receiving the proposal and said it had asked the school to submit a detailed proposal of its overall long-term plan for evaluation.". so what "distortion" is he talking about? what change of teaching is he referring to? its basically a bull. damn it. what do you mean by you cannot "reveal the full contents of the draft"? after all this has happened WHILE YOU WERE IN CHINA, i think we deserve a better explanation. do borrow the question asked by my tutor today, "want to give excuses also must think lah..", your excuses are a full load of crap. and hell yea, i'm getting angry.
victorians cannot be comfortable with the possibility of us going co-ed. that's the problem. if remaking vs means turning vs to a co-ed school. please don't use the school name anymore. change it. it is of great pride to the alumnus and it would be a great shame if girls were to use that name as their alma mater in time to come.
to readers: sorry for th language used. but frankly, such languages are reserved for times such as these.
No comments:
Post a Comment